Showing posts with label niche conservatism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label niche conservatism. Show all posts

Friday, April 11, 2014

More on speciation and extinction rates and latitudinal diversity gradients in amphibians

Common frog (Rana temporaria). Photo by Erik Svensson


Posted by Erik Svensson

It is spring time, and some of you have already noted the frogs that mate in the pond outside the Ecology Building. Then it seems highly timely to discuss some classical problems in ecology and evolutionary biology that have been subject to some previous lab-meetings, but which continue to fascinate many (including me): why are there more species in the tropics?

Is it because of evolutionary history, such as higher speciation rates in the tropics or lower extinction rates over millions of years? Or is it mainly due to ecological factors such as more energy through the sun and higher humidity in the tropics? Or a combination of ecological and evolutionary factors? What about the roles of niche conservatism and diversity dependence, and how do these affect tropical and temperate diversity?

We will discuss a recent paper  about this by Alexander Pyron and John Wiens about latitudinal diversity gradients in amphibians in relation to speciation, extinction and phylogeny. You can find the paper here, and it is a phylogenetic comparative study, and the abstract is appended below.

When: Tuesday, April  15, at 10.30
Where: "Argumentet", 2nd floor, Ecology Building.

Large-scale phylogenetic analyses reveal the causes of high tropical amphibian diversity

Abstract

Friday, April 5, 2013

Updated information about lab-meeting on April 9: ERC, phylogenies and tropical diversification

This is an update about the coming lab-meeting on Tuesday April (10.30), as there was some mis-communication, and it turns out Lesley will not be able to attend the meeting due to a course in landscape genetics, and this is probably also the case for Rachel and Maren. The lab-meeting on Tuesday will start with  Jessica presenting her ERC-talk for the coming interview in Brussels, and she can then get final feedback from the lab-members that attend. Our new student Anais from Cataluna has also promised to bring some catalunian "fika", and we can try out the red wine she brought last week.

Then, we should discuss this paper that I originally suggested which deals with how the use of multiple phylogenies can be used to answer basic ecological and evolutionary questions about the niche conservatism and range expansions and test the classical "tropical conservatism" hypothesis. This paper is in press in Evolution, and is quite long, but in case you have time you can also read the shorter paper Lesley suggested that was published in Ecology Letters

Both these papers are thematically similar and demonstrate the power of a phylogenetic perspective and modern comparative methods to address fundamental problems and general processes in ecology and evolution. The titles and abstracts of both papers are posted below. Enjoy!

WHAT CAN MULTIPLE PHYLOGENIES SAY ABOUT THE LATITUDINAL DIVERSITY GRADIENT? A NEW LOOK AT THE TROPICAL CONSERVATISM, OUT OF THE TROPICS, AND DIVERSIFICATION RATE HYPOTHESES



We reviewed published phylogenies and selected 111 phylogenetic studies representing mammals, birds, insects, and flowering plants. We then mapped the latitudinal range of all taxa to test the relative importance of the tropical conservatism, out of the tropics, and diversification rate hypotheses in generating latitudinal diversity gradients. Most clades originated in the tropics, with diversity peaking in the zone of origin. Transitions of lineages between latitudinal zones occurred at 16–22% of the tree nodes. The most common type of transition was range expansions of tropical lineages to encompass also temperate latitudes. Thus, adaptation to new climatic conditions may not represent a major obstacle for many clades. These results contradict predictions of the tropical conservatism hypothesis (i.e., few clades colonizing extratropical latitudes), but support the out-of-the-tropics model (i.e., tropical originations and subsequent latitudinal range expansions). Our results suggest no difference in diversification between tropical and temperate sister lineages; thus, diversity of tropical clades was not explained by higher diversification rates in this zone. Moreover, lineages with latitudinal stasis diversified more compared to sister lineages entering a new latitudinal zone. This preserved preexisting diversity differences between latitudinal zones and can be considered a new mechanism for why diversity tends to peak in the zone of origin.




  • Alex L. Pigot*
  • Joseph A. Tobias



  • Whether biotic interactions limit geographic ranges has long been controversial, and traditional analyses of static distribution patterns have made little progress towards resolving this debate. Here, we use a novel phylogenetic approach to test whether biotic interactions constrain the transition to secondary sympatry following speciation. Applying this temporal framework to a diverse clade of passerine birds (Furnariidae), we reject models of geographic range overlap limited purely by dispersal or environmental constraints, and instead show that rates of secondary sympatry are positively associated with both the phylogenetic and morphological distance between species. Thus, transition rates to sympatry increase with time since divergence and accelerate as the ecological differences between species accumulate. Taken together, these results provide strong empirical evidence that biotic interactions – and primarily ecological competition – limit species distributions across large spatial and temporal scales. They also offer phylogenetic and trait-based metrics by which these interactions can be incorporated into ecological forecasting models.

    Monday, April 16, 2012

    On cliff effects, male mate preferences and niche use in Calopteryx



    #by Maren Wellenreuther

    I am following Erik’s recommendation that we should all start to more actively promote our own research, and will present some of my most recent publications.The first work  that I would like to highlight is a paper that was started in 2007, when Shawn Kuchta and I arrived in Sweden to start our postdocs on the two charismatic Calopteryx damselfly species found in Sweden, C. virgo and C. splendens. We both arrived just at the start of the field season in May 2007 and had never worked on odonates before. It was an exciting time: we were both living at the University's field station in the middle of the forest, which was also used as a military training ground, and so we could relax in the evening after a hard day in the field, while watching the military training tanks and troops drive through the forest and fields outside the station. Shawn had worked for many years on salamanders while I had studied marine fish, and the different view points and ideas that came along with having studied such different study systems made our conversations about science and evolution rich and interesting. Shawn's work on  Calopteryx damselflies is seeking to measure the strength of natural selection acting on the two Calopteryx species (see photograph below), by collecting wings from feeding stations and comparing them to the variation present in natural populations. Although Shawn has left Sweden and is now an Assistant Professor at Ohio University, he is still actively involved in Calopteryx research and is currently writing up this data-so stay tuned for more on this soon!

    Calopteryx splendens (left) have wing patches that cover roughly 50% of the wings, while C. virgo have almost fully melanised wings.

    At that time that Shawn and I started our work on Calopteryx damselflies in Sweden, another member joined the lab group. Her name is Elodie Vercken, and she was a newly finished postdoc from France who had worked with Jean Clobert on colour morphs and alternative strategies in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. She is now a researcher at INRA (National Institute for Agronomical Research) in Sophia Antipolis in France.

    Elodie Vercken in the field in Sweden catching damselflies fort mate choice experiments.
    Together with Elodie, I spent my days out in the field to measure male and female mate choice in different populations, and trying to relate this mate preference data to population ecology and phenotypic traits (sympatry versus allopatry and so on). It was a hot summer and we tried to stay cool while tethering males and females of both species to bamboo sticks and painting their wings to perform mate presentation experiments. It was great fun.
    Maren Wellenreuther presenting tethered damselflies in the field

    Part of the data that we gathered during that summer was recently used in a modeling paper on cliff-edge effects, which tests the counterintuitive idea that the trait value associated with the maximum of an asymmetrical fitness function is not necessarily the value that is selected for when the trait shows variability in its phenotypic expression.
    Vercken E, Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Mauroy B (2012) Don't Fall Off the Adaptation Cliff: When Asymmetrical Fitness Selects for Suboptimal Traits. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34889.

    From that field season, Elodie, Erik and I also published a paper on male mate preferences in C. splendens, to address the question whether males can distinguish between immigrant and resident females, something previously found for females.
    Wellenreuther M, Vercken E and Svensson EI (2010) A role for ecology in male mate discrimination of immigrant females in Calopteryx damselflies? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 506-518

    In addition to these two papers, I further delved into an area that I had investigated extensively during my PhD work: Habitat use and divergence in habitat space between species. The idea was to extent the work that was previously done by our lab and other groups on the habitat use of the two Calopteryx species, by expanding the spatial scale so that broader questions can be asked. To do this, a large data set for the whole of Fennoscandia was generated using field data and museum records, and niche modelling was used to estimate the extent of niche divergence versus conservatism and to identify the most important environmental variables that correspond to niche differences.  The large data set in this paper also allowed us to look into the following question: what is the extent of niche divergence in species that are thought to have primarily evolved through sexual selection on secondary sexual traits? Based on our results, we argue that adaptive niche diversification appears to play a relatively minor role in speciation and evolutionary divergence in species groups such as salamaders, East African cichlids, and odonates where sexual selection on secondary sexual traits is pronounced and a key element of diversification. This work was done in collaboration with Keith W Larson who has excellent modelling skills and likes to analyze large data sets.
    Wellenreuther M, Larson K W and Svensson E I. (in press) Climatic niche similarity and geographic range limits in ecologically similar co-existing damselflies Ecology

    Maybe Anna Runemark, who is currently finishing her PhD thesis on the Skyros Wall lizard, would like to write the next blog post by telling us about her most recent articles.


    Happy Researching!


    The abstracts to the papers are posted below. 
    Vercken E, Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Mauroy B (2012) Don't Fall Off the Adaptation Cliff: WhenAsymmetrical Fitness Selects for Suboptimal Traits. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34889.
    Abstract: The cliff-edge hypothesis introduces the counterintuitive idea that the trait value associated with the maximum of an asymmetrical fitness function is not necessarily the value that is selected for if the trait shows variability in its phenotypic expression. We develop a model of population dynamics to show that, in such a system, the evolutionary stable strategy depends on both the shape of the fitness function around its maximum and the amount of phenotypic variance. The model provides quantitative predictions of the expected trait value distribution and provides an alternative quantity that should be maximized (“genotype fitness”) instead of the classical fitness function (“phenotype fitness”). We test the model's predictions on three examples: (1) litter size in guinea pigs, (2) sexual selection in damselflies, and (3) the geometry of the human lung. In all three cases, the model's predictions give a closer match to empirical data than traditional optimization theory models. Our model can be extended to most ecological situations, and the evolutionary conditions for its application are expected to be common in nature.

    Wellenreuther M, Vercken E and Svensson EI (2010) A role for ecology in male matediscrimination of immigrant females in Calopteryx damselflies? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 506-518
    Abstract: Sexual selection against immigrants is a mechanism that can regulate premating isolation between populations but, so far, few field studies have examined whether males can discriminate between immigrant and resident females. Males of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens show mate preferences and are able to force pre-copulatory tandems. We related male mate responses to the ecological characteristics of female origin, geographic distances between populations, and morphological traits of females to identify factors influencing male mate discrimination. Significant heterogeneity between populations in male mate responses towards females was found. In some populations, males discriminated strongly against immigrant females, whereas the pattern was reversed or nonsignificant in other populations. Immigrant females were particularly attractive to males when they came from populations with similar predation pressures and densities of conspecifics. By contrast, immigrant females from populations with strongly dissimilar predation pressures and conspecific densities were not attractive to males. Differences in the abiotic environment appeared to affect mating success to a lesser degree. This suggests that male mate discrimination is context-dependent and influenced by ecological differences between populations, a key prediction of ecological speciation theory. The results obtained in the present study suggest that gene-flow is facilitated between ecologically similar populations.

    Wellenreuther M, Larson K W and Svensson E I. (in press) Climatic niche similarity and geographic range limits in ecologically similar co-existing damselflies –Ecology
    The factors that determine species' range limits are of central interest to biologists. One particularly interesting group are odonates (dragonflies and damselflies), which show large differences in secondary sexual traits and respond quickly to climatic factors, but often have minor interspecific niche differences, challenging models of niche-based species co-existence. We quantified the environmental niches at two geographic scales to understand the ecological causes of northern range limits and the co-existence of two congeneric damselflies (Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo). Using environmental niche modelling, we quantified niche divergence first across the whole geographic range in Fennoscandia and second only in the sympatric part of this range. We found evidence for interspecific divergence along the environmental axes of temperature and precipitation across the northern range in Fennoscandia, suggesting that adaptation to colder and wetter climate might have allowed C. virgo to expand further northwards than C. splendens. However, in the sympatric zone in southern Fennoscandia we found only negligible and non-significant niche differences. Minor niche differences in sympatry lead to frequent encounters and intense interspecific sexual interactions at the local scale of populations. Nevertheless, niche differences across Fennoscandia suggest that species-differences in physiological tolerances limit range expansions northwards, and that current and future climate could have large effects on the distributional ranges of these and ecological similar insects. 

    Sunday, April 15, 2012

    On blogging, tweeting and non-ecological speciation



    One of the reasons to have a scientific blog, whether an individual-based or a group-based one like ours, is that you might increase the attention to your research, and hopefully also increase the interest in your work, boost your citation rates and perhaps become more succesful as a scientist in grant applications. But is there any real evidence for this, or is it pure wishful thinking? As a matter of fact, some quantitative evidence is starting to accumulate now, that blogging and tweeting does increase the interest in your work, as judged by increasing number of downloads. Thus, unlike many other scientists who might consider blogging waste of time, I think it is a mistake to dismiss social media in the scientific process these days.

    In the spirit of this, and with the hope to increase the interest in my research, I post my latest article that is published in Organisms, Diversity & Evolution and which is entitled: "Non-ecological speciation, niche conservatism and thermal adaptation: how are they connected?" It is a critical review of the current state of ecological speciation theory, its assumptions and limitations, and with a discussion about some alternatives to ecological speciation. Download it, read it or cite it (or do it all!)! I also present some thermal image data on the thermal niches of two sympatric calopterygid damselflies: Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo.

    This paper was fun to write, and it largely grew out of discussions I had with Andrew Hendry and some other folks at Uppsala last year, when I visited the Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC) in conjunction with the PhD-student defence's of Niclas Vallin and Paolo Innocenti. The Abstract and paper details are given below. Now, perhaps Maren Wellenreuther and Anna Runemark will post about some other recent lab-publications that have come out recently?


    Abstract


    During the last decade, the ecological theory of adaptive radiation, and its corollary “ecological speciation”, has been a major research theme in evolutionary biology. Briefly, this theory states that speciation is mainly or largely the result of divergent selection, arising from niche differences between populations or incipient species. Reproductive isolation evolves either as a result of direct selection on mate preferences (e.g. reinforcement), or as a correlated response to divergent selection (“by-product speciation”). Although there are now many tentative examples of ecological speciation, I argue that ecology’s role in speciation might have been overemphasised and that non-ecological and non-adaptive alternatives should be considered more seriously. Specifically, populations and species of many organisms often show strong evidence of niche conservatism, yet are often highly reproductively isolated from each other. This challenges niche-based ecological speciation and reveals partial decoupling between ecology and reproductive isolation. Furthermore, reproductive isolation might often evolve in allopatry before ecological differentiation between taxa or possibly through learning and antagonistic sexual interactions, either in allopatry or sympatry. Here I discuss recent theoretical and empirical work in this area, with some emphasis on odonates (dragonflies and damselflies) and suggest some future avenues of research. A main message from this paper is that the ecology of species differences is not the same as ecological speciation, just like the genetics of species differences does not equate to the genetics of speciation.







    Saturday, July 23, 2011

    FroSpects-meeting on non-adaptive and non-ecological speciation in Lund August 18 2012



    During the past decade, the ecological theory of adaptive radiation and adaptive speciation has been a main focus of interest in much speciation research. Much of current thinking in this area assumes that incipient species are formed as a direct or indirect result of niche-based ecological differences and divergent natural selection.

    However, more recently it has been an increased interest also in non-ecological and non-adaptive speciation in groups like birds, fish, amphibians and insects. Some radiations are simply not very likely to result from divergent ecological selection, as species are often ecologically similar and show high degree of niche conservatism, yet speciation obviously happens also in these groups. Behavior might play a crucial role in driving speciation processes in these circumstances, including learned mate preferences, sexual selection and sexual conflict. These and related topics will be the focus of one-day scientific meeting at Lund University (Sweden) on August 18 2012.

    On August 18 2012, we are therefore proud to organize this one-day meeting (free of charge) entitled "The Role of Behaviour in Non-adaptive and Non-ecological Speciation".

    This meeting is funded by the European Science Foundation's (ESF) Frontier's of Speciation Research FroSpects, and will be one of several post-conference symposia the day after The International Behavioural Ecology Congress ("ISBE 2012") that will take place between August 12 and August 17 2012

    Note that although the ESF-meeting is free of charge, the preceeding ISBE-congress is not. The meeting is open both for ISBE-participants and those who wish to only come for to the speciation meeting. Coffee and refreshments will be served on August 18, but participants will have to fund and organize travel, meals and ackomodation for themselves.

    In addition to three excellent invited keynote speakers (Dr. Rampal S. Etienne, Prof. Kerry Shaw and Prof. John Wiens), we will also accept contributed talks (15 minutes, including 3 minutes of questions) to this meeting. Send an abstract (100-200 words) to Dr. Maren Wellenreuther (maren.wellenreuther@biol.lu.se), no later than April 2012.  More general questions about the meeting can be answered by Prof. Erik Svensson (erik.svensson@biol.lu.se).

    Organizing committé:


    Prof. Erik Svensson
    Dr. Machteld Verzijden
    Dr. Maren Wellenreuther
    Ms. Anna Runemark 

    Sunday, October 3, 2010

    Updated Wednesday-plans for lab-meeting on October 6

    On Wednesday, our lab-meeting will start one hour later, at 11.15, as there is an interesting seminar that starts at 10.00 in the Limnology Section's seminar room "Tanken" (first floor). The talk will be given by Dr. Martin Lind, former PhD-student in Umeå in the laboratory of Frank Johansson, and currently a VR-postdoc at Sheffield University (UK). The title of Martins talk is:

    "Local adaptation, gene flow, cost and benefits of phenotypic plasticity"

    After the seminar, we walk back to the 2nd floor, and start  our regular lab-meeting at 11.15, i. e. one hour later than usual. This lab-meeting will take place in "Darwin", as has previously been announced. Hopefully, Martin will join us and provide some input on the papers. We will discuss one paper on niche conservatism in North American Jays, and one manuscript of ours that has already been sent out by Maren Wellenreuther. Send Maren an e-mail if you have not yet received this manuscript (maren.wellenreuther@zooekol.lu.se).

    Thursday, September 30, 2010

    Climatic niche similarity and geographic range limits in ecologically similar co-existing damselflies

    Dear all,
    Now it is time to discuss one of my papers again. Together with Keith Larson and Erik Svensson, I am currently working on a paper that investigates niche divergence in Calopteryx damselflies.


    Speciation in the genus Calopteryx is largely thought to be de-coupled from ecology, and reproductive isolation seems to have evolved independent of habitat ecology, through sexual selection, social interactions, learning and/or genetic incompatibilities. For this reason, ecological differences between closely related odonates are a priori expected to be relatively minor, and the modest differences that exist are likely to have evolved post-speciation, reflecting ecological divergence after reproductive isolation was already achieved. We tested these predictions using a large habitat data set for the two largely co-existing species Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo in Sweden and Finland and then employed spatial modelling techniques to identify the:

    (i) environmental habitat characteristics, amount of niche overlap and degree of habitat specialisation,

    (ii) combined and interactive effects of environment and predators and

    (iii) ecological differences between allopatric and sympatric populations.

    It will be great to discuss our findings with you next week (as usual we meet on Wednesday the 6th of October at 10:15 at the Darwin room, Lund University). Erik has also suggested to read a recent paper by John E. McCormack, Amanda J. Zellmer, and L. Lacey Knowles. Their work focused on niche divergence and its role in speciation in Mexican Jays.

    DOES NICHE DIVERGENCE ACCOMPANY ALLOPATRIC DIVERGENCE IN APHELOCOMA JAYS AS PREDICTED UNDER ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION?: INSIGHTS FROM TESTS WITH NICHE MODELS

    I will circulate the Evolution paper by McCormack et al. (2010) and the manuscript via email. If I have not included you in the email list and you would like to read and comment on these papers, then please send an email Maren.Wellenreuther@zooekol.lu.se

    I will bring fika to the next meeting.

    Have fun, Maren





    Sunday, May 9, 2010

    A new synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology?

    On the lab-meeting this coming Wednesday (12 May, 2010), I would like to discuss a review article in TREE about the (possible) new and emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. You can download this article here. Hopefully, we can have a good and conceptually rich dicussion about the general message in this paper.

    The lab-meeting the week after this one (i. e. May 17, 2010), I was planning to have a lab-meeting outdoors, meet the spring and (hopefully!) see the first emerged odonates of the year, followed by lunch at cosy outdooor museum and restaurant Kulturens Östarp. Stay tuned, more info soon.

    Time and place for the coming lab-meeting the current week as usual:

    Where: "Darwin"-room, 2nd floor, Ecology Building
    When: May 10 2010, 10.15

    Any fika-volunteer?