Showing posts with label non-ecological speciation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-ecological speciation. Show all posts

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Visit by Ayana Martins from Brazil and talk about neutrality theory and speciation



Posted by Erik Svensson

As some of you know, I have developed an interest in non-ecological speciation mechanisms over the years, that is how reproductively isolation develops and are maintained between species that are only weakly ecologically niche differentiated (see our publications here and here). More recently I have also become more interested in the ecological side, manifested by the neutral theory of biodiversity and its implications, such as the role of ecological drift. 

Given these interests of mine, I am therefore happy to welcome Dr. Ayana Martins to the EXEB-meeting next week (Tuesday October 11, at 10.00), where she will give an informal talk about her theoretical research in this area. Ayana is thus primarily a theoretical evolutionary biologist, but she is also interested in empirical research in this field. Ayana will visit the department and my group next week to discuss some future collaborations,  and she will stay in Lund until early Thursday morning. Among her previous research, is an interesting paper about "ring species" in evolution.

We plan to go out for beers and something to eat on Tuesday evening (e. g. the new hamburger place "Tugg", see here!), and all EXEB-members who are interested in joining us or would like to talk to Ayana could contact me (email: erik.svensson@biol.lu.se).

More info below, and of course "fika" will be provided. Welcome!

Is there a role for neutrality in speciation?

About Ayana: 
I have a bachelor degree in Biology (2006, University of Campinas, Brazil), a master degree in Genetics and Molecular Biology (2010) from the same institution and a doctor degree in Ecology (2014) from the University of São Paulo (Brazil). Currently, I am a post doctoral research fellow in the Institute of Physics Gleb Wataghin (University of Campinas). Since early May, I have been visiting the Swiss Federal Institute  of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) in Switzerland to carry out part of my current research project. I work with  speciation models mostly addressing the roles of spatial structuring,  population expansion, genetic incompatibilities and non-random mate choice. More recently I have become interested in developing methods to test hypothesis with these models with empirical data



Abstract: 


Neutral theories have had an important role in ecology and evolution not only  by providing novel ideas but also by serving as null models that allow hypothesis to be tested. In this context, the neutral theory of molecular evolution and the unified neutral theory of biodiversity are particularly relevant for understanding speciation since they provide predictions that can be tested at different levels of organization. While these two theories encompass processes that are conceptually related (e.g. genetic drift vs. ecological drift), much progress is needed before these two frameworks are formally integrated. In this talk, I will discuss the conditions for speciation under the assumption of ecological equivalence. I will focus on i) the interplay between spatial isolation and the number of loci resulting in genetic incompatibilities, and ii) how selection resulting from non-random mating schemes is related to neutrality on the level of individuals.
 

Thursday, September 25, 2014

A second try to go the Himalayas


 Posted by Erik Svensson

Since we did not have time to discuss the paper on avian species diversity in eastern Himalaya last week, due to the fact that we enjoyed so much listening to Jessica's talk and drinking cava, we make a new try this coming week. Here is the paper by Trevor Price and his colleagues in Nature.

 For a short summary of the findings in the paper I also recomment this a brief comment about the study by Arne Mooers, in a "News & Views"-article in the same issue of Nature, which is also worth reading.

The picture above shows the national bird of Nepal, the charismatic Himalayan Monal, a pheasant that I was lucky to see myself during my bird watching tour to Nepal in 1991, along the slopes of the Anapurna Trekk. The paper interests me for personal reasons, as already as a young bird watcher in 1991, I wondered about the amazing species diversity and how it came about, before I was very knowledgeable in ecology and evolutionary theory.

Date and time: Tuesday September 30, 10.30
Where: "Argumentet", second floor (Ecology Building)

I will bring fika!

Thursday, May 10, 2012

On sexual selection, non-ecological speciation and species coexistence



Next week's lab-meeting will focus on a topic that is closely connected to our coming ESF-funded workshop in August 2012 about non-ecological and non-adaptive speciation: The problem how weakly ecologically differentiated species might still coexist, in spite of being formed by sexual selection and when there are no or weak niche differences in between them. A recent paper in Nature presents a new model that aims to solve this problem (Abstract, link and authors posted below). You can download this paper here.

Time and place of lab-meeting as usual: "Argumentet" at 13.30, Wednesday May 16.



Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence

  • Leithen K. M’Gonigle,
  • Rupert Mazzucco,
  • Sarah P. Otto
  • Ulf Dieckmann
Nature
 
484,
 
506–509
 
(26 April 2012)
 
doi:10.1038/nature10971
Received
 
Accepted
 
Published online
 

Sunday, April 29, 2012

On speciation, the species problem and the role of species in evolution




This week's lab-meeting will be dedicated to the classical "species problem" in evolutionary biology and the role of species in ecology. We will start off with a brief presentation by Maren Wellenreuther about molecular identification of (putative) hybrid phenotypes between the two calopterygid damselflies (Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo) that she has been working on lately. I will also say a few words about my research trip to Texas, and the remarkable species diversity of odonates in this state (> 260 species in the state of Texas, about five times more than entire Sweden!).

Then, I was thinking we should discuss two recent idéa-articles, which should perhaps be a relatively easy read, and would hopefully be stimulating. One is on the state of the so-called "neutral theory" of species diversity in ecology, and the other is about species concepts and the ephemeral role of species in evolution. Phylogenetic comparative biologist Luke J. Harmon is co-author on both these papers, and one of the other authors is Rampall Etienne, who will be a plenary speaker at our ESF-funded meeting "The role of behaviour in non-adaptive and non-ecological speciation" in August this year. Here you can sign up to this meeting, which is free of charge and will take place on August 18 2012.

Our  lab-meeting  this coming week will take place on May 2, at 13.30 in the seminar room "Argumentet". Below, I provide the abstracts and links to these two interesting articles. You can download them here and here and also by clicking on the Abstract-links below. Enjoy!

The case for ecological neutral theory






Understanding the rate at which new species form is a key question in studying the evolution of life on earth. Here we review our current understanding of speciation rates, focusing on studies based on the fossil record, phylogenies, and mathematical models. We find that speciation rates estimated from these different studies can be dramatically different: some studies find that new species form quickly and often, while others find that new species form much less frequently. We suggest that instead of being contradictory, differences in speciation rates across different scales can be reconciled by a common model. Under the “ephemeral speciation model”, speciation is very common and very rapid but the new species produced almost never persist. Evolutionary studies should therefore focus on not only the formation but also the persistence of new species. 

Monday, April 16, 2012

On cliff effects, male mate preferences and niche use in Calopteryx



#by Maren Wellenreuther

I am following Erik’s recommendation that we should all start to more actively promote our own research, and will present some of my most recent publications.The first work  that I would like to highlight is a paper that was started in 2007, when Shawn Kuchta and I arrived in Sweden to start our postdocs on the two charismatic Calopteryx damselfly species found in Sweden, C. virgo and C. splendens. We both arrived just at the start of the field season in May 2007 and had never worked on odonates before. It was an exciting time: we were both living at the University's field station in the middle of the forest, which was also used as a military training ground, and so we could relax in the evening after a hard day in the field, while watching the military training tanks and troops drive through the forest and fields outside the station. Shawn had worked for many years on salamanders while I had studied marine fish, and the different view points and ideas that came along with having studied such different study systems made our conversations about science and evolution rich and interesting. Shawn's work on  Calopteryx damselflies is seeking to measure the strength of natural selection acting on the two Calopteryx species (see photograph below), by collecting wings from feeding stations and comparing them to the variation present in natural populations. Although Shawn has left Sweden and is now an Assistant Professor at Ohio University, he is still actively involved in Calopteryx research and is currently writing up this data-so stay tuned for more on this soon!

Calopteryx splendens (left) have wing patches that cover roughly 50% of the wings, while C. virgo have almost fully melanised wings.

At that time that Shawn and I started our work on Calopteryx damselflies in Sweden, another member joined the lab group. Her name is Elodie Vercken, and she was a newly finished postdoc from France who had worked with Jean Clobert on colour morphs and alternative strategies in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. She is now a researcher at INRA (National Institute for Agronomical Research) in Sophia Antipolis in France.

Elodie Vercken in the field in Sweden catching damselflies fort mate choice experiments.
Together with Elodie, I spent my days out in the field to measure male and female mate choice in different populations, and trying to relate this mate preference data to population ecology and phenotypic traits (sympatry versus allopatry and so on). It was a hot summer and we tried to stay cool while tethering males and females of both species to bamboo sticks and painting their wings to perform mate presentation experiments. It was great fun.
Maren Wellenreuther presenting tethered damselflies in the field

Part of the data that we gathered during that summer was recently used in a modeling paper on cliff-edge effects, which tests the counterintuitive idea that the trait value associated with the maximum of an asymmetrical fitness function is not necessarily the value that is selected for when the trait shows variability in its phenotypic expression.
Vercken E, Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Mauroy B (2012) Don't Fall Off the Adaptation Cliff: When Asymmetrical Fitness Selects for Suboptimal Traits. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34889.

From that field season, Elodie, Erik and I also published a paper on male mate preferences in C. splendens, to address the question whether males can distinguish between immigrant and resident females, something previously found for females.
Wellenreuther M, Vercken E and Svensson EI (2010) A role for ecology in male mate discrimination of immigrant females in Calopteryx damselflies? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 506-518

In addition to these two papers, I further delved into an area that I had investigated extensively during my PhD work: Habitat use and divergence in habitat space between species. The idea was to extent the work that was previously done by our lab and other groups on the habitat use of the two Calopteryx species, by expanding the spatial scale so that broader questions can be asked. To do this, a large data set for the whole of Fennoscandia was generated using field data and museum records, and niche modelling was used to estimate the extent of niche divergence versus conservatism and to identify the most important environmental variables that correspond to niche differences.  The large data set in this paper also allowed us to look into the following question: what is the extent of niche divergence in species that are thought to have primarily evolved through sexual selection on secondary sexual traits? Based on our results, we argue that adaptive niche diversification appears to play a relatively minor role in speciation and evolutionary divergence in species groups such as salamaders, East African cichlids, and odonates where sexual selection on secondary sexual traits is pronounced and a key element of diversification. This work was done in collaboration with Keith W Larson who has excellent modelling skills and likes to analyze large data sets.
Wellenreuther M, Larson K W and Svensson E I. (in press) Climatic niche similarity and geographic range limits in ecologically similar co-existing damselflies Ecology

Maybe Anna Runemark, who is currently finishing her PhD thesis on the Skyros Wall lizard, would like to write the next blog post by telling us about her most recent articles.


Happy Researching!


The abstracts to the papers are posted below. 
Vercken E, Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Mauroy B (2012) Don't Fall Off the Adaptation Cliff: WhenAsymmetrical Fitness Selects for Suboptimal Traits. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34889.
Abstract: The cliff-edge hypothesis introduces the counterintuitive idea that the trait value associated with the maximum of an asymmetrical fitness function is not necessarily the value that is selected for if the trait shows variability in its phenotypic expression. We develop a model of population dynamics to show that, in such a system, the evolutionary stable strategy depends on both the shape of the fitness function around its maximum and the amount of phenotypic variance. The model provides quantitative predictions of the expected trait value distribution and provides an alternative quantity that should be maximized (“genotype fitness”) instead of the classical fitness function (“phenotype fitness”). We test the model's predictions on three examples: (1) litter size in guinea pigs, (2) sexual selection in damselflies, and (3) the geometry of the human lung. In all three cases, the model's predictions give a closer match to empirical data than traditional optimization theory models. Our model can be extended to most ecological situations, and the evolutionary conditions for its application are expected to be common in nature.

Wellenreuther M, Vercken E and Svensson EI (2010) A role for ecology in male matediscrimination of immigrant females in Calopteryx damselflies? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 506-518
Abstract: Sexual selection against immigrants is a mechanism that can regulate premating isolation between populations but, so far, few field studies have examined whether males can discriminate between immigrant and resident females. Males of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens show mate preferences and are able to force pre-copulatory tandems. We related male mate responses to the ecological characteristics of female origin, geographic distances between populations, and morphological traits of females to identify factors influencing male mate discrimination. Significant heterogeneity between populations in male mate responses towards females was found. In some populations, males discriminated strongly against immigrant females, whereas the pattern was reversed or nonsignificant in other populations. Immigrant females were particularly attractive to males when they came from populations with similar predation pressures and densities of conspecifics. By contrast, immigrant females from populations with strongly dissimilar predation pressures and conspecific densities were not attractive to males. Differences in the abiotic environment appeared to affect mating success to a lesser degree. This suggests that male mate discrimination is context-dependent and influenced by ecological differences between populations, a key prediction of ecological speciation theory. The results obtained in the present study suggest that gene-flow is facilitated between ecologically similar populations.

Wellenreuther M, Larson K W and Svensson E I. (in press) Climatic niche similarity and geographic range limits in ecologically similar co-existing damselflies –Ecology
The factors that determine species' range limits are of central interest to biologists. One particularly interesting group are odonates (dragonflies and damselflies), which show large differences in secondary sexual traits and respond quickly to climatic factors, but often have minor interspecific niche differences, challenging models of niche-based species co-existence. We quantified the environmental niches at two geographic scales to understand the ecological causes of northern range limits and the co-existence of two congeneric damselflies (Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo). Using environmental niche modelling, we quantified niche divergence first across the whole geographic range in Fennoscandia and second only in the sympatric part of this range. We found evidence for interspecific divergence along the environmental axes of temperature and precipitation across the northern range in Fennoscandia, suggesting that adaptation to colder and wetter climate might have allowed C. virgo to expand further northwards than C. splendens. However, in the sympatric zone in southern Fennoscandia we found only negligible and non-significant niche differences. Minor niche differences in sympatry lead to frequent encounters and intense interspecific sexual interactions at the local scale of populations. Nevertheless, niche differences across Fennoscandia suggest that species-differences in physiological tolerances limit range expansions northwards, and that current and future climate could have large effects on the distributional ranges of these and ecological similar insects. 

Sunday, April 15, 2012

On blogging, tweeting and non-ecological speciation



One of the reasons to have a scientific blog, whether an individual-based or a group-based one like ours, is that you might increase the attention to your research, and hopefully also increase the interest in your work, boost your citation rates and perhaps become more succesful as a scientist in grant applications. But is there any real evidence for this, or is it pure wishful thinking? As a matter of fact, some quantitative evidence is starting to accumulate now, that blogging and tweeting does increase the interest in your work, as judged by increasing number of downloads. Thus, unlike many other scientists who might consider blogging waste of time, I think it is a mistake to dismiss social media in the scientific process these days.

In the spirit of this, and with the hope to increase the interest in my research, I post my latest article that is published in Organisms, Diversity & Evolution and which is entitled: "Non-ecological speciation, niche conservatism and thermal adaptation: how are they connected?" It is a critical review of the current state of ecological speciation theory, its assumptions and limitations, and with a discussion about some alternatives to ecological speciation. Download it, read it or cite it (or do it all!)! I also present some thermal image data on the thermal niches of two sympatric calopterygid damselflies: Calopteryx splendens and C. virgo.

This paper was fun to write, and it largely grew out of discussions I had with Andrew Hendry and some other folks at Uppsala last year, when I visited the Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC) in conjunction with the PhD-student defence's of Niclas Vallin and Paolo Innocenti. The Abstract and paper details are given below. Now, perhaps Maren Wellenreuther and Anna Runemark will post about some other recent lab-publications that have come out recently?


Abstract


During the last decade, the ecological theory of adaptive radiation, and its corollary “ecological speciation”, has been a major research theme in evolutionary biology. Briefly, this theory states that speciation is mainly or largely the result of divergent selection, arising from niche differences between populations or incipient species. Reproductive isolation evolves either as a result of direct selection on mate preferences (e.g. reinforcement), or as a correlated response to divergent selection (“by-product speciation”). Although there are now many tentative examples of ecological speciation, I argue that ecology’s role in speciation might have been overemphasised and that non-ecological and non-adaptive alternatives should be considered more seriously. Specifically, populations and species of many organisms often show strong evidence of niche conservatism, yet are often highly reproductively isolated from each other. This challenges niche-based ecological speciation and reveals partial decoupling between ecology and reproductive isolation. Furthermore, reproductive isolation might often evolve in allopatry before ecological differentiation between taxa or possibly through learning and antagonistic sexual interactions, either in allopatry or sympatry. Here I discuss recent theoretical and empirical work in this area, with some emphasis on odonates (dragonflies and damselflies) and suggest some future avenues of research. A main message from this paper is that the ecology of species differences is not the same as ecological speciation, just like the genetics of species differences does not equate to the genetics of speciation.







Thursday, October 6, 2011

Proposals for post-conference symposia after ISBE 2012

It will now be possible to send in proposals for so-called "Post-conference symposia" after the ISBE-meeting (August 12-17 2012) in Lund next year. Post-conference symposia are thematic, one-day long and are organized independently, the day after the regular ISBE-meeting, i. e. on August 18 2012. Already one such post-conference symposium has been decided to take place: our ESF-funded workshop on the role of behaviour in non-ecological and non-adaptive speciation, but there are certainly room for other topics.

It is now possible to send in a proposal here, and the deadline for such proposals will be sometime early next year (January or February 2012).

Saturday, July 23, 2011

FroSpects-meeting on non-adaptive and non-ecological speciation in Lund August 18 2012



During the past decade, the ecological theory of adaptive radiation and adaptive speciation has been a main focus of interest in much speciation research. Much of current thinking in this area assumes that incipient species are formed as a direct or indirect result of niche-based ecological differences and divergent natural selection.

However, more recently it has been an increased interest also in non-ecological and non-adaptive speciation in groups like birds, fish, amphibians and insects. Some radiations are simply not very likely to result from divergent ecological selection, as species are often ecologically similar and show high degree of niche conservatism, yet speciation obviously happens also in these groups. Behavior might play a crucial role in driving speciation processes in these circumstances, including learned mate preferences, sexual selection and sexual conflict. These and related topics will be the focus of one-day scientific meeting at Lund University (Sweden) on August 18 2012.

On August 18 2012, we are therefore proud to organize this one-day meeting (free of charge) entitled "The Role of Behaviour in Non-adaptive and Non-ecological Speciation".

This meeting is funded by the European Science Foundation's (ESF) Frontier's of Speciation Research FroSpects, and will be one of several post-conference symposia the day after The International Behavioural Ecology Congress ("ISBE 2012") that will take place between August 12 and August 17 2012

Note that although the ESF-meeting is free of charge, the preceeding ISBE-congress is not. The meeting is open both for ISBE-participants and those who wish to only come for to the speciation meeting. Coffee and refreshments will be served on August 18, but participants will have to fund and organize travel, meals and ackomodation for themselves.

In addition to three excellent invited keynote speakers (Dr. Rampal S. Etienne, Prof. Kerry Shaw and Prof. John Wiens), we will also accept contributed talks (15 minutes, including 3 minutes of questions) to this meeting. Send an abstract (100-200 words) to Dr. Maren Wellenreuther (maren.wellenreuther@biol.lu.se), no later than April 2012.  More general questions about the meeting can be answered by Prof. Erik Svensson (erik.svensson@biol.lu.se).

Organizing committé:


Prof. Erik Svensson
Dr. Machteld Verzijden
Dr. Maren Wellenreuther
Ms. Anna Runemark 

Sunday, December 13, 2009

On ecological speciation, tempo and mode of evolution

The coming week's lab-meeting (16 December 2009), will be the last one for 2009. Due to teaching obligations, I would like the meeting to start somewhat later than usual, at 10.30. The topic of this week's lab-meeting will be speciation, and we will discuss two papers published in 2009 in and Nature and Science (abstracts are provided below):

Phylogenies reveal new interpretation of speciation and the Red Queen

Chris Venditti1, Andrew Meade1 & Mark Pagel1,2

(Nature advance online publication)

Evidence for Ecological Speciation and Its Alternative

Schluter Dolph

Science (2009) 323: 737-741



These two papers are interesting, because they reflect radically different views on the causes of speciation and the drivers of speciation processes. I therefore thought it would be interesting to discuss them with this in mind, and contrast their different underlying viewpoints against each other. Who is correct and who is wrong? Or are both correct, and if so, in what domains?

We will thus meet at 10.30 in "Darwin" on Wednesday 16 December. Any fika-volunteer?

Abstracts follow below:

Chris Venditti1, Andrew Meade1 & Mark Pagel1,2


Phylogenies reveal new interpretation of speciation and the Red Queen

The Red Queen1 describes a view of nature in which species continually evolve but do not become better adapted. It is one of the more distinctive metaphors of evolutionary biology, but no test of its claim that speciation occurs at a constant rate2 has ever been made against competing models that can predict virtually identical outcomes, nor has any mechanism been proposed that could cause the constant-rate phenomenon. Here we use 101 phylogenies of animal, plant and fungal taxa to test the constant-rate claim against four competing models. Phylogenetic branch lengths record the amount of time or evolutionary change between successive events of speciation. The models predict the distribution of these lengths by specifying how factors combine to bring about speciation, or by describing how rates of speciation vary throughout a tree. We find that the hypotheses that speciation follows the accumulation of many small events that act either multiplicatively or additively found support in 8% and none of the trees, respectively. A further 8% of trees hinted that the probability of speciation changes according to the amount of divergence from the ancestral species, and 6% suggested speciation rates vary among taxa. By comparison, 78% of the trees fit the simplest model in which new species emerge from single events, each rare but individually sufficient to cause speciation. This model predicts a constant rate of speciation, and provides a new interpretation of the Red Queen: the metaphor of species losing a race against a deteriorating environment is replaced by a view linking speciation to rare stochastic events that cause reproductive isolation. Attempts to understand species-radiations3 or why some groups have more or fewer species should look to the size of the catalogue of potential causes of speciation shared by a group of closely related organisms rather than to how those causes combine.



Schluter Dolph

Natural selection commonly drives the origin of species, as Darwin initially claimed. Mechanisms of speciation by selection fall into two broad categories: ecological and mutation-order. Under ecological speciation, divergence is driven by divergent natural selection between environments, whereas under mutation-order speciation, divergence occurs when different mutations arise and are fixed in separate populations adapting to similar selection pressures. Tests of parallel evolution of reproductive isolation, trait-based assortative mating, and reproductive isolation by active selection have demonstrated that ecological speciation is a common means by which new species arise. Evidence for mutation-order speciation by natural selection is more limited and has been best documented by instances of reproductive isolation resulting from intragenomic conflict. However, we still have not identified all aspects of selection, and identifying the underlying genes for reproductive isolation remains challenging.