Meeting 1 dec: Can invertebrates have personalities?

Posted by Jessica Abbot on behalf of Alexander Hegg

This is an interesting essay on the topic of animal personalities, published last year in Animal Behaviour. Most personality studies have focused on vertebrates, but here the authors point out the possible advantages of studying personality variation in invertebrates. What are your thoughts on this? I think it would be an interesting topic to discuss at the next lab meeting.

Link: doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.016

Title: Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother?

Abstract: Research on animal personality variation has been burgeoning in the last 20 years but surprisingly few studies have investigated personalities in invertebrate species although they make up 98% of all animal species. Such lack of invertebrate studies might be due to a traditional belief that invertebrates are just ‘minirobots’. Lately, studies highlighting personality differences in a range of invertebrate species have challenged this idea. However, the number of invertebrate species investigated still contrasts markedly with the effort that has been made studying vertebrates, which represent only a single subphylum. We describe how investigating proximate, evolutionary and ecological correlates of personality variation in invertebrates may broaden our understanding of personality variation in general. In our opinion, personality studies on invertebrates are much needed, because invertebrates exhibit a range of aspects in their life histories, social and sexual behaviours that are extremely rare or absent in most studied vertebrates, but that offer new avenues for personality research. Examples are complete metamorphosis, male emasculation during copulation, asexual reproduction, eusociality and parasitism. Further invertebrate personality studies could enable a comparative approach to unravel how past selective forces have driven the evolution of personality differences. Finally, we point out the advantages of studying personality variation in many invertebrate species, such as easier access to relevant data on proximate and ultimate factors, arising from easy maintenance, fast life cycles and short generation times.

Meeting Nov 24th: sex-bias, X-linkage, and rates of evolution

Posted by Jessica Abbott

D. melanogaster. Photo by Qinyang Li.

Although a number of members of the group are currently away, I thought it would be nice to have a meeting next week anyway. I don't think anyone else has planned anything, so I figured I might as well take the initiative. I suggest that we read the following short paper on the "faster-X effect" - how sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage affect rates of evolution.


Title: The effects of sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage on rates of adaptive protein sequence evolution in Drosophila

Abstract: A faster rate of adaptive evolution of X-linked genes compared with autosomal genes may be caused by the fixation of new recessive or partially recessive advantageous mutations (the Faster-X effect). This effect is expected to be largest for mutations that affect only male fitness and absent for mutations that affect only female fitness. We tested these predictions in Drosophila melanogaster by using genes with different levels of sex-biased expression and by estimating the extent of adaptive evolution of non-synonymous mutations from polymorphism and divergence data. We detected both a Faster-X effect and an effect of male-biased gene expression. There was no evidence for a strong association between the two effects—modest levels of male-biased gene expression increased the rate of adaptive evolution on both the autosomes and the X chromosome, but a Faster-X effect occurred for both unbiased genes and female-biased genes. The rate of genetic recombination did not influence the magnitude of the Faster-X effect, ruling out the possibility that it reflects less Hill–Robertson interference for X-linked genes.

Lab meeting on November 10th at 10.00 on Phylogeography of marine animals

Next Tuesday I'll tell you a little about my past PhD-project in Helsinki University. Fika included, see you there!

-Hanna

My thesis in nutshell:

Phylogeography of amphi-boreal marine fauna

The Northern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans share a faunal element consisting of pairs of closely related vicariant taxa, known as the amphi-boreal fauna. The inter-oceanic systematic affinities reflect a history of shared ancestry since dispersal through the Bering Strait and across the Arctic basin, which was initiated by the opening of the Bering Strait at the end of the Miocene. In my PhD I examined the dynamics and consequences of the faunal interchange between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans since that time up to the present. This was done by comparing differences in the mitochondrial gene sequence variation in different taxonomic groups and across the circum-boreal geographical scale, comprising both newly produced sequences and data from literature, from altogether 70 species or species groups (molluscs, crustaceans, echinoderms, polychaetes, fishes and mammals). Two exemplary genera, pelagic fish genus Clupea and boreal-arctic bivalve Hiatella were examined more closely and with additional markers.

The phylogeographical histories of the Pacific–Atlantic amphi-boreal taxa were found to be remarkably variable. A simple vicariant history since an early, Pliocene or Early Pleistocene (6–3 My ago) dispersal was inferred only in about half of the examined taxa, whereas signatures of more than one trans-Arctic dispersal were found in a third of the cases. A close inter-oceanic relationship that would reflect recent trans-Arctic dispersal or ongoing gene flow was found to be common for amphi-boreal genera (40% of cases). Overall the estimates of inter-oceanic mitochondrial divergence within each of the broader taxonomic groups varied greatly, up to 10–20 fold, and suggest that trans-Arctic faunal dispersal has been a repeated process through the time frame considered. Based on the molecular divergence, several instances of putative new allopatric species were detected in the invertebrates.

Repeated trans-Arctic invasions have practically always resulted in secondary contacts of diverged lineages (for this data, in all cases but one). The Pacific herring C. pallasii, of East Asian origin, invaded the Northeast European seas post-glacially and then differentiated into separate regional populations. In Europe, hybridization with the native sister species C. harengus, the Atlantic herring, has also taken place. The amount of introgression from the Atlantic to the Pacific herring was variable between the various contact regions of the taxa. Most heavily introgressed fjord population in northern Norway has parallels in the boreal bivalves Macoma and Mytilus, for which similar repeated invasion history has been inferred.

Lab meeting on Nov 3 (10.00h) on Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance

Hej,

For next week's lab meeting I would like to discuss the importance of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in evolution. I selected a paper which gives a nice overview of potential mechanisms and some examples of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. The paper is already a bit "old" (1.5 year already) and the discussion is focussing on human health, but it gives a nice overview.

Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Myths and Mechanisms
Cell: Volume 157, Issue 1, p95–109, 27 March 2014

Summary: Since the human genome was sequenced, the term “epigenetics” is increasingly being associated with the hope that we are more than just the sum of our genes. Might what we eat, the air we breathe, or even the emotions we feel influence not only our genes but those of descendants? The environment can certainly influence gene expression and can lead to disease, but transgenerational consequences are another matter. Although the inheritance of epigenetic characters can certainly occur—particularly in plants—how much is due to the environment and the extent to which it happens in humans remain unclear.

Fika will be provided :)

Lab-meeting by Weizhao Yang on Genetic signature of high-altitude adaptation for toads: October 20 (10.00)

Hej!

According to Erik's suggestion, next week on the EXEB-meeting on Tuesday October 20th (10.00 as usual), I will take the opportunity to introduce part of my PhD thesis, genetic signature of high-altitude adaptation for toads.

Asiatic toad  is one of the few amphibians living on the Tibetan Plateau. It has been a true Plateau dweller for approximate 2.5 millions of years and is well-adapted to the environments. In addition, it occupies a large elevational gradient from zero to 4,300m above sea level, which provides excellent opportunities to compare individuals or populations from various altitudes. I implemented a series of experiments to explore the evolutionary genetic signature of altitude adaptation in Asiatic toad, and hope the results could provide useful direction to understand how poikilotherms adapt to high-altitude.

"Fika" will be provided and time and place as usual: "Argumentet" at 10.00.

Congratulations to Jessica Abbott for receiving ERC Starting Grant!

Posted by Erik Svensson 

Last Friday (October 9, 2015), our colleague and one of EXEB:s three PI:s Jessica Abbott found out that she has been awarded an "Starting Grant" from the European Research Council (ERC). This is a very large grant of up to 1.5 million Euro, spread out over a five-year period, and it is highly competitive and prestiguous. 

This ERC-grant will give Jessica the opportunity to further consolidate her research group and hire more postdocs and PhD-students, and will also give her higher job security, as she has sofar only been on a temporary position as Junior Researcher, funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR). It means that we can hopefully soon look forward to see some new faces in the form of students and postdocs at future EXEB-meetings. This will of course further strengthen an already strong and intellectually stimulating scientific environment.

This was the third time Jessica applied for these ERC-grants, and likewise the third time she went to Brussels for an interview with the evaluation panel. Jessica has worked long and hard to get this grant, and she should therefore be proud of this strong achievement. It is the first ERC-grant awarded to any researcher at the Department of Biology in Lund, but hopefully Jessica's example will inspire others to follow in her footsteps.

On behalf of myself, EXEB and many other of our colleagues in the Biology Department and the Evolutionary Ecology Unit, we hereby congratulate Jessica to her achievement. Well done! I am sure you will use this grant money wisely to consolidate your group and develop your research programme further.

 

Lab-meeting 13 October 2015: on neutral theory, ecological drift and the utility of null models in ecology and evolution

Posted by Erik Svensson

For the lab-meeting this forthcoming week, I was thinking we should discuss a short - but hopefully provocative - opinion paper about the utility of the Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity (UNTB), which became famous but also controversial about 15 years ago when Stephen Hubbell published his Princeton-monographs. Proponents of the neutral theory, including Hubbel himself, sees UNTB as community ecology's counterpart to the neutral theory of molecular evolution in population genetics, and a rigorous point-of-departure and null model. Opponents - including some leading ecologists like Bob Ricklefs - dismiss UNTB on various empirical grounds. Who is right and who is wrong? Or can both sides be partly right? I hope we can have a good discussion about this.

I also hope to show some  unpublished and preliminary data on these questions from our ongoing research on damselflies and the prospects for ecological drift in these insects. 

Time and place as usual: "Argumentet", October 13 at 10.00.

The case for ecological neutral theory

By:Rosindell, J (Rosindell, James)^{[ 1,2,3 ]} ; Hubbell, SP (Hubbell, Stephen P.)^{[ 4,5 ]} ; He, FL (He, Fangliang)^{[ 6,7 ]} ; Harmon, LJ (Harmon, Luke J.)^{[ 2,8 ]} ; Etienne, RS (Etienne, Rampal S.)^{[ 9 ]}

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION

27: 203-208

DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.004

Published: APR 2012

Abstract

Ecological neutral theory has elicited strong opinions in recent years. Here, we review these opinions and strip away some unfortunate problems with semantics to reveal three major underlying questions. Only one of these relates to neutral theory and the importance of ecological drift, whereas the others involve the link between pattern and process, the tradeoff between simplicity and complexity in modeling, and the role of stochasticity and drift in ecology. We explain how neutral theory cannot be simultaneously used both as a null hypothesis and as an,approximation. However, we also show how neutral theory always has a valuable use in one of these two roles even though the real world is not neutral.