Showing posts with label wing colouration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wing colouration. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

When Biologists move to the dark side: working hand in hand with physicists to understand the role of color in the evolution of species


PART 1 

 *by Maren Wellenreuther, Anna Runemark and Mikkel Brydegaard

We study a variety of species in our lab, such as ecotypes of isopods and color morphs of lizards and damselflies. In our work on these species, color is one of the main traits that we examine. This is because color affects crypsis (isopods), sexual selection and other life history traits (lizards and damselflies). However, examining color is not a trivial undertaking. For example, biologists often fail to account for differences in animal visual systems when modeling how species are perceived by con- and heterospecifics. Many also fail to realize that most cameras are not sufficiently spectrally resolved (they have 3 bands only) to capture color and that most spectrophotometers are not sufficiently spatially resolved to capture heterogeneity in color patterns (since they give averages rather than spatially resolved measures, consequently, both a donkey and a zebra would appear grey to a high resolution spectrometer). 



Ecotypes of isopods Asellus aquaticus, color morphs of the Skyros Wall Lizard Podarcis gaigeae, and different colors a mating couple of the structurally colored Calopteryx virgo


The beginnings…                      

When we first started to measure color, we realized how difficult this task actually is. This is particular true when one wants to conduct color experiments in natural or laboratory settings. What light sources are needed? What color vision does the color-signal-receiver have? Faced with these problems, we quickly recognized that we needed to communicate with people that know how to measure color. The Atomic Physics Section at Lund University has a group (Applied molecular spectroscopy and remote sensing) under the supervion of Sune Svanberg that, among other things, specializes in the measurement of color. First contact with the group was established in 2007 when Fabrice Eroukhmanoff was hoping to quantify the color of isopod ecotypes, of which one ecotype typically inhabits the reed habitat, while the other one prefers chara habitat. Fabrice wanted to quantify the color of different ecotypes. After talking to Mikkel Brydegaard Sørensen, a PhD student in Sune’s group, they realized that in order to compare the photographs, he needed to standardize them posteriori to account for different light environments. The color analyses are presented in, for example, here.  Discussions and exchange of ideas between our group and Sune’s group helped in the years to come to set up carefully planned experiments to examine color traits. 

To illustrate the point…measuring complex color traits in the Skyros Wall lizard

For Anna Runemark, who is studying color morphs of the Skyros Wall lizard but also dorsal coloration, color is one of the core traits of her studies. In her work, she is interested in the strength and direction of sexual selection on different color morphs in island and mainland populations (see here). To measure color differences, Mikkel designed an optically isolated ‘photo-box’ with a standardized light environment (e.g. the only illumination source is the flash) and polarizing filters in front of the flash and the objective to avoid specular reflectance. As the distances from the flash vary with position in the box, the white background is used to interpolate an illumination profile on the lizard, and this was used to correct for illumination differences across the photograph. Lastly, to estimate the entire color probability distribution (includes information about both mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis etc., see e.g. the 2D examples in the figure below), the color of each pixel of the measured colour patch was quantified, spatially accumulated and then divided by the number of pixels to obtain the probability. This method is presented in a paper found here

Figure 4-taken from (Brydegaard, Runemark et al. 2012). Upper row: reflectance distributions for a homogeneously colored yellow-throated lizard. Lower row: corresponding distributions for a orange-yellow patchy specimen. Left column: three 1D distributions for each spectral band. Middle column: 2D chromatic plane distributions color coded with corresponding colors for the two example specimen. Right column: iso-surfaces encapsulating probabilities higher than 1% in the 3D RGB color space of the two sample specimens. Surfaces are coded with corresponding colors.



After these initial dialogs between biologists and physicist, it became clear that we can both learn from each other. We as biologists have an interest in capturing color traits of animals accurately and precisely, while physicist that study natural phenomena have a need to understand the biological underpinnings. As a result of this initial integrative work, the Lund CAnMove group organized a symposium entitled ”The Biology-Physics Interface”. During this day, many of us met and presented our research and discussed ideas. 


Caption: CAnMove symposium ”The Biology-Physics Interface”. Sune Svanberg at the top, and Erik Svensson below.



References


Brydegaard, M., A. Runemark, et al. (2012). "Chemometric approach to chromatic spatial variance. Case study: patchiness of the Skyros wall lizard." Journal of Chemometrics

Eroukhmanoff, F., A. Hargeby, et al. (2009). "Parallelism and historical contingency during rapid ecotype divergence in an isopod." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22(5): 1098-1110.

Runemark, A. and E. I. Svensson (2012). "Sexual selection as a promoter of population divergence in male phenotypic characters: a study on mainland and islet lizard populations." Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106(2): 374-389.




Sunday, January 23, 2011

Lab-meeting on insect wing colouration and UV-vision

















At the first lab-meeting of 2011 (January 26, at 10.15 in "Darwin"), I was thinking that we should discuss two new interesting papers about insect wing colouration and insect UV-vision. The first one is the beautiful paper in PNAS by some systematist colleagues from our own department in Lund (see pictures above), and the second one is about sexual selection and UV-vision in butterflies by Ron Rutowski's group. The two papers are partly related, and should be read as companions. They have some relevance to our past and ongoing work on wing colouration in damselflies, including the UV spectrum (as yet unpublished, but in preparation by Maren, Mikkel and myself). These two papers can be downloaded here and here.

The Morehouse/Rutowski-study deals with female choice of male wing colouration of white cabbage butterflies. It deals with vision in the UV-spectrum, and how male attractiveness and predation risk are linked to each other, when explicitly modelling the UV-vision properties of mates and predators. It has also been covered by the popular science site Science Shot. It is highly relevant to our own work on damselflies, I think. Incidentally, Ron Rutowski will be external opponent on a thesis on butterfly ecology in Stockholm on March 18, 2011, where I am in the committée and there will be a small symposium the day before where Mactheld and I will give research presentations, so we can ask him then about details this study if some questions come up during our lab-meeting on Wednesday.

The "Lund paper" in PNAS is about iridescent colouration on transparent insect wings ("Wing Interference Patterns", or WIP:s), how such WIP:s can be used as species and sex-identification cues and the implications for systematics and evolutionary developmental biology ("evo devo"). It might very well turn out that this paper will revolutionize and speed up the process of species identification in some difficult groups such as small hymenopterans and dipterids. If the paper holds what it promises, it might even be more useful than DNA-based species-identification methods, as it is faster, cheaper and non-invasive, making the method of much practical use when working with museum collections of small animals where one could not (or do not want) to sacrifice tissue, but need to identify species anyway. Obviously, the paper have implications also for speciation, species recognition and sexual selection.

There are two detailed and interesting blog posts about this paper by evolutionary geneticist Jerry Coyne on "Why Evolution is True" and by Ed Young at "Not Exactly Rocket Science". Both are worth reading, in addition to the original paper. Ed Young points out another interesting implication of this study: "Since the colours come from the microscopic shape of the wing, every hair, bump, ridge and vein affects the pattern of the WIPs. If an insect evolves a larger, thicker wing, its colours change. If the wing gains or loses veins, the colours change. Indeed, the unseen influence of these colours could explain why the veins of some insect wings are incredibly varied, for no obvious reason. Through these changing colours, the evolution of flies and wasps may start becoming more transparent." 

 As we have often discussed the adaptive significance of various small morphological aspects of insect wings (e. g. shape, the number of positions of veins etc.) in our own work in our lab, this adds another interesting dimension to such structures, although it should be said that these WIP:s are only known to operate on small wings (1 cm or less) and are unlikely to be important in larger insects like odonates, unfortunately.


I hope you will enjoy these two interesting papers, as well as appreciate the links above. Time and place as usual for our lab-meeting: Wednesday (January 26) at 10.15 in "Darwin". Any fika volunteer?