Lab-meeting on intraspecific assortative mating, disruptive selection and sympatric speciation

Posted by Erik Svensson on behalf of John Waller

This week's lab-meeting will continue on the theme of assorative mating and how it can possibly work together with disruptive selection to cause sympatric speciation. We will discuss two papers by Daniel Bolnick at University of Texas (Austin): one review paper in American Naturalist and one modelling paper in American Zoologist. Abstracts are found below.

Date: Tuesday March 25, 10.30
Place: "Argumentet", 2nd floor, Ecology Building

Assortative Mating in Animals

Yuexin Jiang, Daniel I. Bolnick and Mark Kirkpatrick

Abstract

Assortative mating occurs when there is a correlation (positive or negative) between male and female phenotypes or genotypes across mated pairs. To determine the typical strength and direction of assortative mating in animals, we carried out a meta-analysis of published measures of assortative mating for a variety of phenotypic and genotypic traits in a diverse set of animal taxa. We focused on the strength of assortment within populations, excluding reproductively isolated populations and species. We collected 1,116 published correlations between mated pairs from 254 species (360 unique species-trait combinations) in five phyla. The mean correlation between mates was 0.28, showing an overall tendency toward positive assortative mating within populations. Although 19% of the correlations were negative, simulations suggest that these could represent type I error and that negative assortative mating may be rare. We also find significant differences in the strength of assortment among major taxonomic groups and among trait categories. We discuss various possible reasons for the evolution of assortative mating and its implications for speciation.

Current Zoology    2012, 58(3): 484 - 492

Daniel I. BOLNICK, Mark KIRKPATRICK

The term 'assortative mating' has been applied to describe two very different phenomena: (1) the tendency for individuals to choose phenotypically similar mates from among conspecifics; or (2) the tendency to prefer conspecific over hete- rospecific mates (behavioral reproductive isolation). Both forms of assortative mating are widespread in nature, but the relationship between these behaviors remains unclear. Namely, it is plausible that a preference for phenotypically similar conspecifics incidentally reduces the probability of mating with phenotypically divergent heterospecifics. We present a model to calculate how the level of reproductive isolation depends on intraspecific assortative mating and the phenotypic divergence between species. For empirically reasonable levels of intraspecific assortment on a single trait axis, we show that strong reproductive isolation requires very substantial phenotypic divergence. We illustrate this point by applying our model to empirical data from threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus and Darwin’s Finches (Geospiza spp). We conclude that typical levels of intraspecific assortment cannot generally be extrapolated to explain levels of interspecific reproductive isolation. Instead, reproductive isolation between species likely arises from different mate choice behaviors, or multivariate assortative mating

On the antagonistic relationship between sexual selection and assortative mating

Posted by Erik Svensson


It is time for lab-meeting again, and this week we are happy to welcome Machteld Verzijden back from Rutgers University, where she has been working with Jessica Ware. Let's start the lab-meeting with her telling us about her work and the progress made during the visit.

Note the new time: Wednesday March 28 at 13.30 (not 13.00!).


After this, I was thinking we should discuss the relationship between sexual selection and assortative mating, two processes that are often confused and mixed up, particularly in the field of sympatric speciation. Although these processes are by no means totally independent, they are not identical and their population genetic consequences are very different. Moreover, they can counteract each other and hence could be antagonistic.

To understand the finer details of the complex relationship between assortative mating and sexual selection, we'll have to leave the murky shallow waters of "Adaptive Dynamics" and instead to turn to a clear thinker and a population genetic theoretician who knows what he is talking about: Mark Kirkpatrick från Austin (Texas). I was thinking we should read a much-cited papers from Proceedings of the Royal Society, entitled "Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation". Below, you will find the Abstract and here is a downloadable link to the PDF:


Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation

1. Mark Kirkpatrick^* and 
2. Scott L. Nuismer†

Source: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES  Volume: 271   Issue: 1540   Pages: 687-693   DOI:10.1098/rspb.2003.2645   Published: APR 7 2004

Abstract

Recent theory has suggested that sympatric speciation can occur quite easily when individuals that are ecologically similar mate assortatively. Although many of these models have assumed that individuals have equal mating success, in nature rare phenotypes may often suffer decreased mating success. Consequently, assortative mating may often generate stabilizing sexual selection. We show that this effect can substantially impede sympatric speciation. Our results emphasize the need for data on the strength of the stabilizing component of selection generated by mating in natural populations.

Lab-meeting on good genes and ecological speciation January 13 2009

It is time for lab-meetings again, and what would be more suitable to start with than a theoretical paper about "good genes" and speciation? You will find this paper here, and it has recently been published in Science by van Doorn et al. You will find the abstract below:

On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection

G. Sander van Doorn,^1,2,*, Pim Edelaar,^3,4,5,* Franz J. Weissing³

Ecological speciation is considered an adaptive response to selection for local adaptation. However, besides suitable ecological conditions, the process requires assortative mating to protect the nascent species from homogenization by gene flow. By means of a simple model, we demonstrate that disruptive ecological selection favors the evolution of sexual preferences for ornaments that signal local adaptation. Such preferences induce assortative mating with respect to ecological characters and enhance the strength of disruptive selection. Natural and sexual selection thus work in concert to achieve local adaptation and reproductive isolation, even in the presence of substantial gene flow. The resulting speciation process ensues without the divergence of mating preferences, avoiding problems that have plagued previous models of speciation by sexual selection.

Time and place as usual: "Darwin" at 10.15 (immediately after the "Pheromone group"). It would be great if you could respond below if you will come (or not!), as I am not sure how many are back in town. Any fika-volunteer?